Cases 31 - 40 of 54,008
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Alabama, State of et al v. Cardona et al
as 7:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Alabama, State of, Florida, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Defendant:
Miguel Cardona and U.S. Department of Education
Amicus Curiae:
New Jersey, State of, California, State of, State of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Boulder Care
as 5:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Dana D Williams
Defendant:
Boulder Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lee Company v. Central North Alabama Health Services Inc
as 5:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Lee Company
Defendant:
Central North Alabama Health Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Paty v. Castro
as 7:2024cv00815
Petitioner:
Lacey M Paty
Respondent:
Castro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Professional Collection Services
as 2:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Anesha Taylor
Defendant:
Professional Collection Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
