Cases 41 - 50 of 22,094
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Simplot AB Retail, Inc. v. Hamilton
as 2:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Simplot AB Retail, Inc. doing business as Simplot Grower Solutions
Defendant:
Oscar L. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson et al v. Pirtle (CONSENT)
as 1:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Betty Johnson and J. R.
Defendant:
Lisa Pirtle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleckler v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Joshua Matthew Cleckler
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockhart v. Marley (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Lockhart
Defendant:
Josh Marley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Le v. Mims et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Le
Defendant:
Beth Mims, City of Jemison and Rickey Patrick Self
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Drake et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Tomeka Lashun Williams
Defendant:
Kenneth Drake, Brian Coleman, Mr. Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Brown et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Nona Adam Brown, Joseph Angelo, Paul Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florence v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Florence
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Futral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
