Cases 81 - 90 of 26,472
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MCKINNEY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Defendant:
COUNSELOR RAULS, JOHN DOE, COII SHAKRISTY LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DEWAYNE MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUMANITARIAN v. TREADWELL et al
as 7:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN
Defendant:
MARC T TREADWELL, JUDGE LESLIE A GARDNER, KATHLEEN LOGSDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ADAN v. DOE
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
SALEEBAN ISSE ADAN
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TOWNES v. DAVIS et al
as 7:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
DARIAN TOWNES
Defendant:
HEATHER DAVIS, WARDEN/C-T VALDOSTA STATE PRISON and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRACKE v. MATTHEWS
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY STRACKE
Defendant:
PEYTON MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
HURST et al v. BOSTON PLACE PROPERTY, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
ELBERT HURST and ALICE HURST
Defendant:
BOSTON PLACE PROPERTY, LLC and JOHN/JANE DOE, ADMINISTRATOR OR EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHNNY NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
JACKMAN v. KASPER
as 1:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Graham Jackman
Respondent:
JEANIE KASPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUNTER v. JACKSON et al
as 5:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
JASON HUNTER, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF THEODORE JACKSON and PAUL BLACKMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
