Cases 81 - 90 of 34,550
Cisneros-Gonzalez, Jose v. Alex C. et al
as 8:2024cv02072
Petitioner:
Tony and Jose A Cisneros-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Alex C. and Alejandra-Veronica
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brasher v. Davis et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Marcus Allen Brasher
Defendant:
Nurse Rebecca, Ann Davis, Nurse Jamie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACHILLE v. DUVAL et al
as 5:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
RIDGH GENESIS ACHILLE
Defendant:
FELIX, DUVAL and T. RHSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballester, John v. Centurion Health Care Provider
as 1:2024cv23320
Defendant:
Centurion Health Care Provider
Plaintiff:
John W. Ballester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudgins Verellen v. Falkenham
as 8:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Hope Hudgins Verellen
Defendant:
Falkenham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Passmore v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Defendant:
Daniel J. Craig, Augusta Judicial Circuit District Attorney Office, Hugh Hadden and others
Plaintiff:
Kenny Passmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ringold v. Burch et al
as 1:2024cv00311
Defendant:
Paul Burch and Sam Houston
Plaintiff:
Marcus S. Ringold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacoby v. Harris (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00548
Defendant:
T. Harris
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Montgomery County Detention Facility (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Davontae Quincy Owens
Defendant:
Montgomery County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. EVANS et al
as 3:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP S WRIGHT, JR
Defendant:
EVANS, HUGHES and PASCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
