Cases 81 - 90 of 85,548
LANE v. BOOKER et al
as 2:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN HYRUM LANE
Defendant:
BETH BOOKER, ABIGAIL CONKLIN, JOYCE A. HATFIELD-WISE, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Serrano-Munoz v. USA
as 1:2024cv00993
Petitioner:
David Serrano-Munoz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Van v. Ricard
as 1:2024cv00994
Petitioner:
Andre Van
Respondent:
WARDEN Ricard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Castro-Mota v. Loveridge et al
as 3:2024cv00996
Petitioner:
Santos Castro-Mota
Respondent:
Leslie Loveridge, Michelle Henry, Robert Manzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bouza v. FCI-Allenwood-Medium
as 4:2024cv00998
Petitioner:
William T. Bouza
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Allenwood-Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mays v. USP-Lewisburg et al
as 3:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
USP-Lewisburg, A. Cotterall, Romig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. McGinley et al
as 4:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
Armoni Masud Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, Keri Moore, Amy Wheary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Huff v. Booher et al
as 3:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
Clark K. Huff
Defendant:
Bradley Booher, Tiffany Sottile, Dr. Jacqueline Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerry Ransome v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 24-2110
Plaintiff:
KERRY RANSOME
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Julio Graciano v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-2107
Plaintiff:
JULIO GRACIANO
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
