Cases 101 - 110 of 24,781
WILLIAMS v. HUTTON et al
as 1:2024cv06563
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
PTL. WILLIAM HUTTON, PTL. S. O'HALLORAN, B. FIDUCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRAY v. MARSTON
as 2:2024cv02339
Plaintiff:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and DONALD MCCRAY
Defendant:
KAREN S. MARSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILLAGRAN v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv06523
Plaintiff:
JEREMY VILLAGRAN
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv06520
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CRAWFORD
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Longo, Jr. v. Hannah Trostle, et al
as 24-1981
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. LONGO, JR.
Defendant:
HANNAH TROSTLE, RNS, SCI-Camp Hill, MR.. ARQUELLES, SCI-Camp Hill and DR. VOORSTAD, SCI-Camp Hill
Austin v. SCI-Dallas Mailroom Staff et al
as 4:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Shaun Austin
Defendant:
SCI-Dallas Mailroom Staff and Former Superintendent Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
CURRY v. IMAN et al
as 1:2024cv06556
Plaintiff:
LAQUANE CURRY
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT J. IMAN, OFFICER A. VELEZ, SERGEANT M. DEHARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRITTEN v. BRYAN-HENDERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
GERALD L. CRITTEN
Defendant:
DIRECTOR LENA BRYAN-HENDERSON and PUBLIC DEFENDER ALEXA GRISTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. SOUTH WOODS ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv06509
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE B. CONNER
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iverson v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Richard Iverson
Defendant:
Robert May, Jane/John Doe, Scott Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
