Prison Condition Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,008
Antwain Dennis v. Kendall Evans
as 24-6244
Plaintiff: ANTWAIN LAMAR DENNIS
Defendant: KENDALL EVANS and DOMINIQUE PEPPERS
Dea'Shawn Harrison v. Alan Wilson
as 24-6242
Plaintiff: DEA'SHAWN HARRISON
Defendant: ALAN WILSON, Attorney General of South Carolina and THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Kashika Speed v. Kevin Thompson
as 24-6236
Plaintiff: KASHIKA SPEED
Defendant: KEVIN THOMPSON, Health Services Administrator, FCI McDowell, RN WALTON, and and WARDEN C. MARUKA, FCI McDowell
Kashika Speed v. Mr. C. Maruka
as 24-6235
Plaintiff: KASHIKA SPEED
Defendant: MR. C. MARUKA, Warden, MR. KEVIN THOMPSON, (HSA), MRS. C. CARATHERS, (P.A.) and others
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff: SOFIA CANO
Defendant: SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
David Patterson v. David Spence
as 24-6205
Plaintiff: DAVID A. PATTERSON
Defendant: DAVID SPENCE, JUDGE HARRELL, DALLAS ROSE and others
Jimmy Causey v. Charles Williams
as 24-6198
Plaintiff: JIMMY H. CAUSEY
Defendant: CHARLES WILLIAMS, MS. DAVIS, MS. CLOUD and others
Charles Cook v. Surry County Sheriff's Office
as 24-6194
Plaintiff: CHARLES DAVID COOK
Defendant: SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, OFFICER GOINS, Sheriff, OFFICER ETHAN EVANS, Sheriff and others
Carlos Hernandez v. Dean Locklear
as 24-6157
Plaintiff: CARLOS HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Ra Saadi Lennox Hernandez El
Defendant: DEAN LOCKLEAR, Superintendent/Warden of Scotland Correctional Institution, in their individual and official capacity, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, (SRG) Staff-Officer, in their individual and official capacity, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, Walker, Staff-Officer, in their individual and official capacity and others
Adam Hall v. Sergeant Truner
as 24-6148
Plaintiff: ADAM WADE HALL
Defendant: SERGEANT TRUNER and DAC OF PRISON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?