Cases 41 - 50 of 1,098
Garretson v. Bayside of King George II, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
Troy Garretson
Defendant:
Bayside of King George II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Turner v. QC Franchise Group LLC
as 7:2023cv05910
Plaintiff:
Brandice Turner
Defendant:
QC Franchise Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Lele Ngatche v. Freshly, Inc.
as 8:2023cv03143
Plaintiff:
Marie Lele Ngatche
Defendant:
FRESHLY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
Mook v. City of Martinsville, Virginia et al
as 4:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Mook
Defendant:
City of Martinsville, Virginia and G. Andrew Hall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Harrison v. County of Anderson
as 8:2023cv05875
Plaintiff:
Melissa Harrison
Defendant:
County of Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Lane v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC
as 9:2023cv05803
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lane
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hill v. Whitten Center et al
as 6:2023cv05731
Plaintiff:
Marteebia Hill
Defendant:
Whitten Center, Elizabeth Redd and Craig Byrd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
LaDuke v. The Boeing Company
as 2:2023cv05698
Plaintiff:
Derrick R. LaDuke
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Brent v. City of Charlotte, North Carolina et al
as 2:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Brent J. Kelly
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, North Carolina, Marcus D. Jones and Jason M. Schneider
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Moody v. So-Pak-Co Inc
as 4:2023cv05290
Plaintiff:
Karen Moody
Defendant:
So-Pak-Co Inc doing business as Sopakco Packaging
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
