Cases 81 - 90 of 11,344
Lacayo v. Dalton
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Julio Lacayo
Defendant:
Natalia Dalton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Miller et al v. Tysons Watch and Jewelry Exchange et al
as 1:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
David Miller and Sabrina Miller
Defendant:
Tysons Watch and Jewelry Exchange, Rose Bouchard, Jerry Bouchard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant:
NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
LIBRE IMMIGRATION SERVICES, INC.
Chesapeake Bank v. Jones, et al.
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Bank
Defendant:
Stella Gale Jones, Perfect Touch Innovations, LLC and Valley Communities Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Li v. Bristol
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Min Li
Defendant:
Alonzo Lonnie Bristol, III
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Piaggio v. Puga
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Aldo Enrique Fausto Francsiscolo Piaggio
Defendant:
Claudia Maria Palacios Puga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 Intl Child Abduction Remedies Act
RATCHFORD et al v. GASELA, INC
as 1:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Alana Marie Souza, andra Cheri moreland, Dessie Pilek and others
Defendant:
GASELA, INC doing business as MI GRAN MARIACHI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Morris v. NC Education Lottery et al
as 3:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Charles Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
NC Education Lottery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Entri LLC v. GoDaddy.com LLC
as 1:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Entri LLC
Defendant:
GoDaddy.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
