Cases 91 - 100 of 165,996
Lawson v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Benjamin Lawson
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stuckey v. Bowie County Correctional Center et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Rakiem Henderson Stuckey
Defendant:
Bowie County Correctional Center and Turnkey Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grizzle v. Unnamed Lewis Unit Officials
as 6:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Unnamed Lewis Unit Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Wellpath
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Burnett
Defendant:
Wellpath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilcher v. Pike County
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Tracy Wilcher
Defendant:
Pike County
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. Harris County Medical United
as 4:2024cv02266
Plaintiff:
Wendell Thomas
Defendant:
Harris County Medical United
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skinner v. Bowman et al
as 4:2024cv02267
Plaintiff:
Jessie P. Skinner
Defendant:
Jevon Bowman, C. Alexander, James Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wickman v. The State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01494
Petitioner:
Jeremy Wickman
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Robinson v. MTC Corp of Utah et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Willard Joel Robinson
Defendant:
MTC Corp of Utah, Mr FNU Schmoker, Ms FNU Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley v. Pool et al
as 5:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Donald Ashley, Jr
Defendant:
B Pool and L Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
