Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 101,910
Ratliff et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04994
Plaintiff: Semaj Ratliff, Larrion Brown, Rynalder Williams and others
Defendant: Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Szpila v. Warden
as 3:2024cv01521
Plaintiff: Rhyian Szpila
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gordon et al
as 1:2024cv05042
Plaintiff: Ricardo Dale Smith
Defendant: Andrew Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURHAM v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00318
Petitioner: AKIEM DURHAM
Respondent: WADAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Wills
as 1:2024cv01222
Petitioner: Howard Ellis
Respondent: Anthony Wills
Not Yet Classified: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THURMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01028
Petitioner: CORDNEY THURMAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
LENOIR v. JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv01027
Plaintiff: SHAQUILLE DELSHAUN LENOIR and ARYN DESHAE MARIE
Defendant: JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL, JOHNSON COUNTY SHERRIFF DEPARTMENT, PSYCH DOCTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mohamed v. Heeg et al
as 3:2024cv00488
Plaintiff: Gavin Thomas Mohamed
Defendant: Ronald C Heeg, LaPorte County, Steve Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. LARSEN et al
as 1:2024cv01025
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY PARKER
Defendant: TAD LARSEN, FOUR UNKNOWN MARION COUNTY DEPUTIES and UNKNOWN MEDICAL PERSONNEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GADDIS v. DUNLAP et al
as 1:2024cv01026
Plaintiff: JAMAR GADDIS
Defendant: DUNLAP, DUSTIN, BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?