Cases 41 - 50 of 31,191
Socolova v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01856
Plaintiff:
Liubovi Socolova
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Songer, Jr. v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Andrew Songer, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Curtis v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01849
Plaintiff:
Henry Edward Curtis
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Daniel v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05108
Plaintiff:
Bobby Daniel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 4:2024cv04050
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Douglas Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Husic v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Zineta Husic
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Osmanovic v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Merima Osmanovic
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Obaid v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Hatem Jawad Obaid
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Katie Rygmyr v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-2005
Plaintiff:
Katie Rygmyr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
