Cases 51 - 60 of 3,812
Winnett v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Donald F Winnett
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fongers v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mitchell Fongers
Defendant:
C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Marbley v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jaster Lee Marbley
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ybarra v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04026
Petitioner:
Amber Ybarra
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holliday v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Russell Holliday
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Lona McCastlain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lewis v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04022
Petitioner:
Travis Cain Lewis
Respondent:
State of Arkansas and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Western District of Arkansas)
as 6:2024cv06034
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bobbitt v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 4:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mason Bobbitt
Defendant:
US Marshals, USA, PCRDF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stephenson v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
DeAndra Stephenson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
