Cases 111 - 120 of 3,345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fedynich et al v. Stalkfleet et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Fedynich and Nicole Fedynich
Defendant:
Sam Stalkfleet, Trinatee Morrow, Drew Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Petersen v. City of Newton, Iowa et al
as 4:2023cv00408
Petitioner:
Noah James Petersen
Defendant:
City of Newton, Iowa, Michael Hansen and Rob Burdess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Petersen v. City of Newton, Iowa et al
as 4:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Noah James Petersen
Defendant:
City of Newton, Iowa, Michael Hansen and Rob Burdess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Robinson v. Linn et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Victor L Robinson
Defendant:
Matt Linn, Baily Anderson, Hellen M Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
