Cases 101 - 110 of 95,816
Ford v. Big
as 4:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Jamie Sue Ford
Defendant:
Donald Big
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Busby et al v. Wayne County, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Daniel Busby and Laura Jungers
Defendant:
Wayne County, Missouri, Dean Finch, Christopher Schulz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Marr v. Stobie
as 4:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Brooke J. Marr
Defendant:
Laura Hawk Stobie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dale v. Morris et al
as 4:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Jody Darna Dale, Jr.
Defendant:
Kelly Morris, Caseworker Unknown Hill, COIII Unknown Volkart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Pitlyk
as 4:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Barry Jackson
Defendant:
Sarah E. Pitlyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banilla Games, Inc. et al v. Bootheel Location Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Banilla Games, Inc. and Grover Gaming, Inc.
Defendant:
Bootheel Location Inc. and Rahim Kajani
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Banilla Games, Inc. et al v. Bootheel Location Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Banilla Games, Inc. and Grover Gaming, Inc.
Defendant:
Bootheel Location Inc and Rahim Kajani
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
