Cases 141 - 150 of 95,888
Schnur v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Mia Schnur
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ewing v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Ewing
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fields v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Charitine Chante Fields
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Humphrey v. Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
as 6:2024cv03179
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Taylor v. USA
as 3:2024cv05045
Petitioner:
Johnny T. Taylor
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Gilmore v. City of Cape Girardeau et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Gilmore
Defendant:
City of Cape Girardeau, Wes Blair, Mark Welker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Jasleen Enterprises LLC
as 4:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Brian Anthony Pratt
Defendant:
Jasleen Enterprises LLC d/b/a Vapor Maven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Cannon v. GardaWorld Security Services Management Company, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Cannon
Defendant:
GardaWorld Security Services Management Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
