Cases 81 - 90 of 95,505
Pace v. U.S. Bancorp et al
as 4:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pace v. OneMain Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sesson v. Ruhman et al
as 4:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Johnny Bruce Sesson, III
Defendant:
Det. Crystal Ruhman, Det. Matthew Geisman and Det. Joseph Percich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Keete Group
as 4:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
David Lettieri
Defendant:
Keete Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knighten v. Drury Hotels Company, LLC
as 4:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Kayla Knighten
Defendant:
Drury Hotels Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jennings v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Sondra Jennings
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States of America v. Rooks
as 6:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Franklin Innis Rooks
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 3116 VA Overpayment
Adkins v. Skivers et al
as 4:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Robert Joshua Adkins
Defendant:
Officer Jason Skivers, City of Sugar Creek, Officer Ethan Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
