Cases 101 - 110 of 70,616
Steele v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00478
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Steele
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Selzer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00479
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Selzer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Awes-Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00480
Plaintiff:
Brittany Awes-Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00481
Plaintiff:
Maria Christina Diaz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Angel Armenta Casas v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Angel Armenta Casas
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Menina v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Lee Menina
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Cathey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Karrie Jo Cathey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tyler v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Stacey A. Tyler
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Grigsby v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03088
Plaintiff:
James Grigsby
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mackey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03089
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Mackey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
