Cases 111 - 120 of 54,439
Burton v. Marshall et al
as 4:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Burton
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Carol Boone, Judge Phil K Seay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cadence Bank v. Combs Healthcare, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01177
Defendant:
Bryan P Combs and Combs Healthcare, LLC
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hawley et al v. Lutley
as 2:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Gregory H Hawley and Judy Shay Lutley
Defendant:
Wayne Lutley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Johnson v. Onondaga County Health Department
as 2:2024cv01201
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Onondaga County Health Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
The Eshelman Company, Inc. v. Waste Water Industrial Solutions, LLC
as 2:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
The Eshelman Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Waste Water Industrial Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
