Cases 1 - 10 of 26,353
HA v. GARLAND et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TRANSBOTICS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Transbotics, a division of Scott Systems International, Inc.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KPMG, LLP and INFINITY ROBOTICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
HOUSTON v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Defendant:
OFFICER MITCHELL and DEPUTY WARDEN LATORSHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THRIVEN DESIGN INC v. ASPEN TOPCO II ACQUISITIONS LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
THRIVEN DESIGN INC and KITCHEN & ASSOCIATES SERVICES INC
Defendant:
ASPEN TOPCO ACQUISITIONS LLC, ASPEN TOPCO CONSTRUCTION LLC and ASPEN TOPCO II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WHITFIELD v. SELENE FINANCE LP
as 5:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Lequita R Whitfield
Defendant:
Selene Finance, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DAVIS v. MONROE et al
as 7:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
SHELAINE V DAVIS
Defendant:
JUDGE MATT MONROE, JUSTO CABRAL, VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent:
Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAPMAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
YAQUAN LAVETT SANDY CHAPMAN
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
