Cases 121 - 130 of 24,451
Beatty v. Legge et al
as 1:2024cv01188
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Beatty
Defendant:
Katherine Legge, Stephanie Mitchell and Caitlyn Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. USA
as 4:2024cv04093
Petitioner:
Cordero Joshua Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Winchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
Edward S. Winchell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Allen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
Jennifer N Allen
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ritter et al v. SECURA Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01187
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ritter and Angela Ritter
Defendant:
SECURA Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Williams v. Baxter Credit Union
as 3:2024cv03126
Plaintiff:
Kreshon Leroy Williams
Defendant:
Baxter Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Coleman v. Melcher et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coleman
Defendant:
Melcher and Illinois State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson, as Representative of the Estate of Jordan Richardson v. King et al
as 2:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Amy Richardson, as Representative of the Estate of Jordan Richardson
Defendant:
Jerry King and Village of Rantoul, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortiz v. Adkins
as 2:2024cv02114
Petitioner:
Juan Ortiz
Respondent:
Felicia Adkins
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tracy v. Nall et al
as 4:2024cv04092
Plaintiff:
Steven Tracy, Jr
Defendant:
. Nall and East Moline Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
