Cases 91 - 100 of 72,463
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01588
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PRADO-VALERO v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00441
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Petitioner:
JOSE A. PRADO-VALERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BOARDS v. MUSSON ET AL
as 1:2024cv01556
Defendant:
DALTON BALLARD, ROBERT PONTIUS, ERIC LORD and others
Plaintiff:
CARL R WEBB II BOARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOARDS v. AK ET AL
as 1:2024cv01581
Plaintiff:
CARL R WEBB II BOARDS
Defendant:
AK and INTERNAL INVESTIGATION OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY CUSTODY OFFICIAL'S/OFFICER'S
as 1:2024cv01598
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY COOK
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY CUSTODY OFFICIAL'S/OFFICER'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROGAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROGAN
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HEATHER RUSSELL, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RHOADES et al, v. LAKEWOOD DESIGN BUILD, INC.
as 1:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE AND INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
LAKEWOOD DESIGN BUILD, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
LINEBAUGH v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. LINEBAUGH
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
NEWSOM v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01589
Plaintiff:
RYAN M. NEWSOM
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
QUINCY v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00167
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA MONIQUE QUINCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
