Cases 121 - 130 of 71,604
WALTERS v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2024cv00978
Plaintiff:
LANCE WALTERS and CARINA WALTERS
Defendant:
WELLPATH, AKANBI and KERRY J. FORRESTAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRYE v. SCHNELL
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
SAVION KAIN FRYE
Defendant:
RANDY SCHNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACKALL v. BELL et al
as 2:2024cv00296
Defendant:
RICHARD STUART JOSEPH, KATHERINE SWEENLEY BELL, KATHRYN STUART and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MACKALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODWIN v. GRAY et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
DAVID GOODWIN
Defendant:
TONY GRAY and CLARA DEBOSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VARGAS v. VENTURE TRANSPORTATION PARTNERS, LLC d/b/a VENTURE LOGISTICS
as 1:2024cv00952
Plaintiff:
Julio Vargas
Defendant:
Venture Transportation Partners, LLC d/b/a Venture Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
BMO BANK N.A. v. 1ST PRIORITY COURIER LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
BMO BANK N.A.
Defendant:
1ST PRIORITY COURIER LLC and SHELONDA WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
EGGERT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
JAMES EGGERT
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
VELICKA v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
LINDA VELICKA
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BECK v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
MARK BECK
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
