Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 61 - 70 of 71,249
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00828
Petitioner: DAQUWON RICHARDSON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WHEAT et al v. MENARD INC.
as 1:2024cv00811
Plaintiff: GLEN WHEAT and LINDA WHEAT
Defendant: MENARD INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00810
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00803
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00177
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00826
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWSTER v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPT. et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff: BARBARA JEAN BREWSTER
Defendant: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPT. and CALHOUN COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLLIVER v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff: THEOTIS D. TOLLIVER
Defendant: SAMUEL BYRD and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv00809
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, DUAN PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?