Cases 91 - 100 of 7,795
Sencial v. Coll et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Steven Sencial
Defendant:
Arthur Coll, A Galvez, S Reina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosario-Colon v. Vannoy
as 2:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Walter Rosario-Colon
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Webre et al
as 2:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Quentin Williams
Defendant:
Craig Webre, Stan Cowley, Juluette Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Porter v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Russell Roberts and Andria Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Overton v. Duplessis et al
as 2:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Angela Overton
Defendant:
Garland Duplessis, City of New Orleans, Dichelle Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payton v. USA
as 2:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Andrew Payton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Colon v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Irwin Gomez Colon
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Turlich, et al.
as 2:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Elijah Brown and Elijah Deshunn Brown
Defendant:
Unidentified Parties, Sheriff Turlich, Denise Narcisse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Paxton et al
as 2:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Elijah Brown
Defendant:
Lieutenant Paxton and Deputy Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
