Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Cases 81 - 90 of 25,193
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Glick et al
as 7:2024cv00353
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: John Ted Glick and Jane Califf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Wysinger v. Bryson et al
as 7:2024cv00350
Plaintiff: Kendall D. Wysinger
Defendant: Mr. S. Bryson and Warden Mr. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pope v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00357
Petitioner: Jered C. Pope
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kimble v. Ritchie
as 7:2024cv00348
Plaintiff: Eugene Junior Kimble
Defendant: Clark A. Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. McCall
as 7:2024cv00351
Plaintiff: Brian Turner
Defendant: Matt McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Gullett et al
as 7:2024cv00349
Plaintiff: Jullian Andrew Pres Huffman
Defendant: Captain Gullett, Major Parks and Smantha Parson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nutrien AG Solutions, Inc. v. Orion Solutions, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00354
Plaintiff: Nutrien AG Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: Orion Solutions, LLC and Russell (Shawn) Rakes
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff: Hassie Ann Lane
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kindred Cain9 Connections, Inc. v. Booth et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: Kindred Cain9 Connections, Inc.
Defendant: Brooke Booth and Wendy Hasenbalg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Huffman v. Parks
as 7:2024cv00346
Petitioner: Julian Huffman and Jullian Huffman
Respondent: Major Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?