Cases 21 - 30 of 31,217
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Thomson v. Community First Credit Union
as 1:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomson
Defendant:
Community First Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Knurr v. Anthem Life and Disability Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
Timothy S. Knurr
Defendant:
Anthem Life and Disability Insurance Company and Bultman Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United States of America v. Hoffman
as 1:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
eShipping LLC v. Focused Transport Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
eshipping LLC
Defendant:
Focused Transport Solutions LLC, Annette Cady, Kelsie Peterson and others
Kurtz et al v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
James D Kurtz and Alisanny Montero
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Tony Evers, N7445 Racetrack Road and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris-Cook v. Tourtillott et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Preston Harris-Cook
Defendant:
Angie Tourtillott and Coleton Wnek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vongoszknovffczedich-heidler v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Nostaligelia Vongoszknovffczedich-heidler
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robinson v. Benzel
as 2:2024cv00413
Petitioner:
Tomaz S Robinson
Respondent:
Jason Benzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fischer-Hamilton v. Hepp
as 2:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Demonte Fischer-Hamilton
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
