Cases 71 - 80 of 14,108
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 5:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney and Angel Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lewis v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Vashun Lewis
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baker v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Samuel Baker
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bausch Health Ireland Limited et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Bausch Health Ireland Limited and Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
West Virginia United Health System, Inc. v. GMS Mine Repair and Maintenance, Inc. Employee Medical Plan, et al.
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
West Virginia United Health System, Inc. d/b/a West Virginia University Health System, et al.
Defendant:
GMS Mine Repair and Maintenance, Inc. Employee Medical Plan and The Health Plan of West Virginia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ford v. Lovette
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Dallas Ford
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stebbins v. USA
as 1:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Randall Richard Stebbins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lewis v. Warden of USP Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Vashun Lewis
Respondent:
Warden of USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
