Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 71 - 80 of 18,523
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00937
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00697
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taebel v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Defendant: Indiana State of, Eric Holcomb and Rokita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belford v. Anonymous Doctor et al
as 3:2024cv00456
Other: Edward Belford
Defendant: Anonymous Doctor, Anonymous Nurse and Anonymous Medical Organization
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY GRIFFIN, LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIFFIN v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY GRIFFIN
Defendant: LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN, DANNY CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
RROS et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, IN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff: RROS and BROOKIE R. MORRISON
Defendant: CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, IN, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00628
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?