Cases 71 - 80 of 7,322
TAEBEL v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
as 1:2024cv01331
Plaintiff:
MITCH TAEBEL
Defendant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rosario v. Sweeney et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Defendant:
John Doe Officers 1-6, P.O. Kristen Sweeney and City of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ZILIAK v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00133
Defendant:
Randall Stoltz, Jennifer Farrar, Stephanie Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Cindy Ziliak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEGEMOLLER v. ALBERT et al
as 1:2024cv01306
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN STEGEMOLLER
Defendant:
OFFICER BRIAN SILCOX and KEITH ALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAEBEL v. FRIEDMAN et al
as 1:2024cv01330
Plaintiff:
MITCH TAEBEL
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB and GRETA FRIEDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Elzey et al v. Huntington County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2024cv00317
Defendant:
24/7 Towing, Huntington General Contractors, Huntington County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Kortney Lee Elzey and Choice Conractors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Goldman v. Goldman et al
as 2:2024cv00262
Defendant:
Sinha Saket M.D. doing business as House-Call Doctors, LLC, Tracy A. Coleman, Ricky L. Goldman and others
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Goldman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunn v. Sigsbee et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Defendant:
City of Elkhart, Dean Marks, Scott Wagner and others
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Layman v. Young et al
as 3:2024cv00602
Defendant:
Dustin Young, Matthew Schwartz and Elkhart City of
Plaintiff:
Hahkeem Jamal Layman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FOUTCH v. MONTGOMERY
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LESLIE FOUTCH
Defendant:
PHELAN JAMES MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
