Cases 21 - 30 of 413
Botelho v. RIDOC et al
as 1:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Joseph Botelho
Defendant:
RIDOC, Robert Abbey Achindiba, MD, Eunice Bosede Kola-Idowu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tassone v. Director Salisbury
as 1:2023cv00280
Petitioner:
Gary Tassone
Respondent:
Director Salisbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lastarza v. Neronha et al
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Lastarza
Defendant:
Peter F. Neronha and Patricia A. Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lucas
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Peter F. Nerhona, Wing Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tassone v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Gary Tassone
Defendant:
Wayne Salisbury, Nancy Routolo Hull, Dorathy Kruck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sevegny v. Robinson et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Bryan Sevegny
Defendant:
Christine Robinson, Assistant Director- Rhode Island Department of Corrections and Vanessa Lisi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Warden Nessinger et al
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Jesus Maldonado
Defendant:
Warden Nessinger, Major Lapore, Major Damaso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Defendant:
Lauran Nicholson, Thomas Gulick, Maureen B Keough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benbow v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Aaron Benbow
Defendant:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Salisbury, et al.
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Defendant:
Wayne Salisbury, Carole Dwyer, Jack Shamks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
