Cases 11 - 20 of 7,791
PARKER v. LARSEN et al
as 1:2024cv01025
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY PARKER
Defendant:
TAD LARSEN, FOUR UNKNOWN MARION COUNTY DEPUTIES and UNKNOWN MEDICAL PERSONNEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GADDIS v. DUNLAP et al
as 1:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
JAMAR GADDIS
Defendant:
DUNLAP, DUSTIN, BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HIPPS v. MILLER et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ROBERT HIPPS
Defendant:
LUCAS MILLER, SWAIN and LAFAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. MILNER et al
as 2:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
KIEARA R. CARTER
Defendant:
STACY MILNER, PAMELA FERGUSON and ALYSSA MEYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. CENTERION CORPERATION et al
as 1:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant:
CENTERION CORPERATION, VERDON, ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKLEY v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BLAKLEY
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. VINARDI, K. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
GEORGE A. PARKER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCKETT v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOCKETT
Defendant:
ARAMARK, FOX, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
RICCI DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC and JASON CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
OMAR DAVIS
Defendant:
MARK MURRAY and WOLKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
