Cases 111 - 120 of 1,350
Brown v. Transco Lines Inc
as 4:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Cody Brown
Defendant:
Transco Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Elder v. Pelley Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv03035
Plaintiff:
Joshua Elder
Defendant:
Pelley Construction, Inc. and Jay Newport
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Murray v. Delta Asphalt of Arkansas Inc
as 3:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Gaylon Murray
Defendant:
Delta Asphalt of Arkansas Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Wallace v. Kids for the Future Inc
as 2:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Robbie Wallace
Defendant:
Kids for the Future Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Trullinger v. Jonesboro Arkansas, City of
as 3:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Laura Trullinger
Defendant:
Jonesboro, City of and Jonesboro Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Williams v. Esmah Investment Group LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Leanne Williams
Defendant:
Esmah Investment Group LLC and Khaled Alnehmi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Brown v. Independent Case Management Inc
as 4:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Alexis Brown
Defendant:
Independent Case Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Frazier v. Downtown Deliveries Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Shane Frazier
Defendant:
Downtown Deliveries Inc and Nathan Brown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Rodas v. Cypress Pork LLC
as 4:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Neli Rodas
Defendant:
Cypress Pork LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Monahan v. Red Mule Express LLC
as 3:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Richard Monahan
Defendant:
Red Mule Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
