Cases 31 - 40 of 1,728,190
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Victory Business Solutions, LTD et al v. Lihaona, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Victory Armoring Solutions Global, Victory Business Solutions, LTD, Tac Americas, Ltd and others
Defendant:
Lihaona, LLC, Ronald Trent Kimball, Factory Hill, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ALVAREZ v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00732
Petitioner:
AIMEE ALVAREZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
RODEN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00729
Petitioner:
JERRY WAYNE RODEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
FARRELL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00731
Petitioner:
ANTHONY FARRELL
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Edsal Manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. United States
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Edsal Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
