Cases 101 - 110 of 31,304
Lazur v. Lake County Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00309
Defendant:
Stozer, John Doe, Lake County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lazur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vlietstra v. Starkey et al
as 2:2024cv00310
Defendant:
Airren Nylin, Samantha Sullivan, Derek Diehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. Thornton et al
as 3:2024cv00745
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Toby T Maxwell and Toby Maxwell
Defendant:
Lisa Blunt, Daniels and Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. NEAL et al
as 1:2024cv01510
Defendant:
DAWN BUSS, RON NEAL, JOE SNYDER and others
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. KNOX COUNTY SHERRIFF et al
as 2:2024cv00432
Defendant:
DOUG VANTLIN and KNOX COUNTY SHERRIFF
Plaintiff:
MARK ALLEN MARSHALL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01518
Defendant:
GEO PRISON COMPANY, CHRISTINA REAGLE, NEW CASTLE PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL VEGA, LILLIE, BACHAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2024cv00120
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, DANGLER, GOODMAN and others
Plaintiff:
DONTEREGAN SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2024cv01535
Defendant:
TUTTLE, ADAMS and SENSE
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01521
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCARTHY v. HEPPNER et al
as 1:2024cv01496
Defendant:
BELL, RENEE GURRERO, JASON CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSEPH MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
