Cases 111 - 120 of 17,837
Young v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Kiaran Young
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Larr v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00656
Petitioner:
Michael L. Larr
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belton v. Shoop
as 3:2024cv00655
Petitioner:
Anthony Belton
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goins v. Winkel
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Justin Goins
Defendant:
Corporal Winkel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
James C Miller
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes, III v. Wellpath et al.
as 4:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
EnRico T Rhodes, III
Defendant:
Wellpath, Commissioner D. Ditzler, Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peterson et al. v. Willoughby Hills P.D. et al.
as 1:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson and Latoya Brisco
Defendant:
Willoughby Hills P.D., Officer Boepple, Officer Coninenza and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Sanders v. USA
as 1:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
Deon Sanders
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
