Cases 21 - 30 of 244,328
Moss v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Don Moss
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Holz v. LNU et al
as 5:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Holz v. Katterhenry
as 5:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Dan Katterhenry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Holz v. Linsay
as 5:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Terry Linsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00439
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Respondent:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coomes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Colin Coomes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rohbock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Mickey Rohbock
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Trim Art, LLC v. Baca Systems, LLC
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Trim Art, LLC
Defendant:
Baca Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Palmer v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Layna Palmer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Oakes Auto, Inc. et al v. Mitsubishi Motors of North America et al
as 2:2024cv02175
Plaintiff:
Oakes Auto, Inc. and DO KCK, LLC
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Motors of North America and Phil Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
