Cases 21 - 30 of 1,134,279
Battle v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Respondent:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson et al v. SV Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robinson and Jonathan Robinson
Defendant:
SV Group, Inc. and Renardo Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Howard v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Pamela Howard
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BERKLEY SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY CHURCH, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
BERKLEY SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
LIBERTY CHURCH, INC., PAR CHURCH BUILDERS, INC. and JOES ROOFING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
RUMPH v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
TAVARES RUMPH
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
LLOYD ANTHONY DAVIS
Defendant:
FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, REGION 1 PHARMACY and FNU PAWKK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
