Cases 41 - 50 of 90,189
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Fermo v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management et al
as 1:2024cv00142
Defendant:
U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, Kiran Ahuja and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Jacob Fermo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Trejo v. Fair et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Alberto Trejo
Defendant:
K. Fair and Arnaldo Mercado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudgins v. 2215 Northport Opco LLC
as 7:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Marcellus M Hudgins
Defendant:
2215 Northport Opco LLC doing business as Forest Manor Health and Rehab
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Bank v. Do et al
as 2:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank
Defendant:
Hoa Thi Do and Hong Kong Seafood Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Buggs v. Leslie et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00270
Defendant:
Donna Leslie, Montgomery Area Mental Health Authority and Steve Marshall
Plaintiff:
Dynassus Buggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Javaughn Edwards
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shuford v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Brandon Denard Shuford
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Caliza LLC v. B. Riley Retail Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Caliza LLC
Defendant:
B. Riley Retail Solutions, LLC and Great American Global Partners, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
