Cases 41 - 50 of 88,900
Gordon v. Dandridge et al
as 2:2024cv02333
Plaintiff:
Willie Gordon
Defendant:
Patrick M. Dandridge, A. Collins, D. Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Magness v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Heather Magness
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Huckelberry v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02329
Plaintiff:
Natalie Huckelberry
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Chaffin v. Schneider et al
as 3:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Kristofer T. Chaffin
Defendant:
Daniel A. Schneider and Tacoma Chiropractic Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Other Fraud
Wellman v. Robin Hood Condos HOA
as 3:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
William Wellman
Defendant:
Robin Hood Condos HOA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Waters v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Reginol Leon Waters
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Frank Strata, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Hatfield et al
as 3:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewan Robertson
Defendant:
Gary Hatfield and Amber L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
B. et al v. United Healthcare Services Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Ly B. and Le B.
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services Inc. doing business as United Healthcare, United Behavioral Health, HCA Health and Welfare Benefits Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Doe (RJC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RJC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
