Cases 51 - 60 of 7,421
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stokes-Koenig v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Rebecca P. Stokes-Koenig
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Swint v. RsCore et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Defendant:
RsCore, J.V. and Family, AT&T and others
Whisler v. Van De Mark et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Zubulon C. Whisler
Defendant:
Joseph Van De Mark, Krista Anderson and Kari Kristiansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Native Village of Unalakleet et al v. United States Department of Agriculture's Rural Utilities Service et al
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Native Village of Unalakleet and Native Village of Elim
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture's Rural Utilities Service and Andrew Berke
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Scharf v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Diedri Scharf
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Cornette v. Altepeter et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas Cornette
Defendant:
L. Altepeter, N. Sailer and Matt Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Spiroska v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Katerina Spiroska
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Javier v. Bode et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Sean Javier
Defendant:
Bode, Dean R. Williams and S. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
