Cases 61 - 70 of 7,421
Donnelly v. Cagle et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Donnelly
Defendant:
John C. Cagle, Melissa Howard and Elvina Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott et al v. Movement Mortgage, LLC
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Aaron Scott and Tabitha Scott
Defendant:
Movement Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Swett v. Alaska Native Medical Center et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Leon James Swett
Defendant:
Alaska Native Medical Center, State of Alaska and Matsu Regional Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davison v. Mooney
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Davison
Defendant:
Edward C. Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Woodmen et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
Jonathan Woodmen, Kerry Corass, Katholyn Runnels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Tucker et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
Lane Tucker, Curtis Vic, Christopher Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ambrose v. Pais et al
as 4:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
David R. Ambrose, II
Defendant:
Salvatare Pais, Donald Trump, Mike Pompeo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Watterson Construction Company v. Principal Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Watterson Construction Company
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company and Professional Benefit Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
United States of America v. Branshaw
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Whitney Branshaw
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
James v. Mun et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Paul R. James, Jr.
Defendant:
Mun, Wassilie and Kargass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
