Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 21,995
Trejo v. Fair et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff: Alberto Trejo
Defendant: K. Fair and Arnaldo Mercado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLain v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff: Leah Y McLain
Defendant: Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Shuford v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff: Brandon Denard Shuford
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Heath et al v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00264
Plaintiff: Johnathan Heath and Anna Holliday
Defendant: John Doe and U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00265
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Mitchell et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff: Demericon Alex Williams
Defendant: Phillip Mitchell and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00261
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson et al v. SV Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff: Joseph Robinson and Jonathan Robinson
Defendant: SV Group, Inc. and Renardo Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?