Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Zarlenga, et al v. US, et al
as 23-1221
Plaintiff / Appellant: LORI ANN ZARLENGA, VICTORIA A. ZARLENGA, Decedent and LORI A. ZARLENGA
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States, BARACK OBAMA, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
Zarlenga, et al v. US, et al
as 23-1170
Plaintiff / Appellant: LORI ANN ZARLENGA, VICTORIA A. ZARLENGA, Decedent and LORI A. ZARLENGA
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States, BARACK OBAMA, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
Bush, et al v. Fantasia, et al
as 22-1755
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL BUSH, LINDA TAYLOR, LISA TIERNAN and others
Plaintiff: ANITA LOPEZ, IAN SAMPSON, JOSEPH PROVENZANO and others
Defendant / Appellee: LINDA FANTASIA, MARTHA FEENEY-PATTEN, ANTHONY MARIANO and others
Petitioner: HEIDI KAITER and JILL OWENS
Del Villar-Rosario v. Puerto Rico Department of Justice, et al
as 22-1526
Plaintiff / Appellant: EURIPIDES DEL VILLAR-ROSARIO
Defendant / Appellee: PR DEPT OF JUSTICE, DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN and others
Defendant: ILEA CORREA-BENABE, CARLOS TORRES, ORLANDO RAMOS and others
Clapp v. Tobin, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN S. CLAPP
Defendant: CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., Governor of Massachusetts, MICHAEL W. MORRISSEY, Norfolk County District Attorney, RICHARD D. MCKEON, Massachusetts State Police (Retired) and others
Defendant / Appellee: TROOPER BRUCE TOBIN, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office, TROOPER SCOTT KEARNS, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office, SGT. BRIAN BROOKS, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2082
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mondol, et al v. Somerville, MA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2076
Plaintiff - Appellant: GALILEO MONDOL, ALISON HINES and MARK MONDOL
Defendant - Appellee: SOMERVILLE, MA, JOSEPH CURTATONE, ANTHONY PIERANTOZZI and others
Movant - Interested Party: WHDH-TV and ROSEMBERG PEREZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1014
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sinapi v. RI Board of Bar Examiners, et al
as 16-2261
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY E. SINAPI
Defendant - Appellee: RHODE ISLAND BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, DAVID ALAN WOLLIN, individually and in his official capacity as member of the RI Board of Bar Examiners, MELLISSA K. BURNETT-TESTA, individually and in her official capacity as member of the RI Board of Bar Examiners and others
Defendant: C. LEONARD O'BRIEN, individually and in his official capacity as member of the RI Board of Bar Examiners
Sinapi v. RI Board of Bar Examiners, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2251
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANTHONY E. SINAPI
Defendant - Appellant: RHODE ISLAND BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, DAVID ALAN WOLLIN, individually and in his official capacity as member of the RI Board of Bar Examiners, MELLISSA K. BURNETT-TESTA, individually and in her official capacity as member of the RI Board of Bar Examiners and others
Defendant: C. LEONARD O'BRIEN, individually and in his official capacity as member of the RI Board of Bar Examiners

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?