Cases 1 - 10 of 386
Cantrell v. Brunswick Maine Police, et al
as 24-1522
Plaintiff:
BRICE CANTRELL
Defendant:
BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE, BRUNSWICK, ME, SCOTT STEWART and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant:
BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
Seguin v. Rhode Island Department of Human Services, et al
as 24-1313
Plaintiff:
MARY SEGUIN
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, in its official capacity, RHODE ISLAND OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, in its official capacity, GERO MEYERSIEK, in his individual and official capacity and others
Cogley v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 24-1309
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COGLEY
Defendant:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode Island Governor 2013-2015 in his official capacity, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Rhode Island Governor 2015-2021 in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Terenzio, et al v. Urena, et al
as 24-1244
Plaintiff:
DELMA TERENZIO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph A. Terenzio, THOMAS SULLIVAN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John J. Sullivan and EDWARD POULIN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maurice C. Poulin
Defendant:
FRANCISCO URENA, MARYLOU SUDDERS and CHERYL LUSSIER POPPE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barth v. Town of Waterboro, et al
as 24-1170
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant:
TOWN OF WATERBORO, GARY LAMB, SAMUEL G. JOHNSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
