Cases 41 - 50 of 2,677
Pinney v. Police of La Salle Illinois, et al
as 24-1035
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
LASALLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LASALLE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, LASALLE COUNTY COURT and others
Carleton v. Wintle, et al
as 24-1032
Plaintiff:
RYAN T. CARLETON
Defendant:
PISCATAQUIS COUNTY JAIL, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Pinney v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 23-2077
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER STATE HOSPITAL, DR. NIKHIL MATHEWS, CITY OF BOSTON and others
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SUMBUL SIDDIQUI, Mayor, CHRISTINE ELOW and others
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 23-2061
Plaintiff:
EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant:
BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Cruz-Rivera v. US
as 23-1984
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS CRUZ-RIVERA
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Woodham v. Woodham, et al
as 23-2025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRACE WOODHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET WOODHAM, ROBERT WOODHAM, TREVOR GARNER and others
Noble v. Napier
as 23-1994
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Respondent / Appellee:
STEPHANIE NAPIER, Acting Warden, FMC Devens
Wholey v. Bradley, et al
as 23-2076
Petitioner:
JOHN F. WHOLEY, JR.
Respondent:
HONORABLE JUDGE HEATHER BRADLEY, Hingham District Court, JUDGE JAMES BYRNE, Hingham District Court, CLERK MAGISTRATE PAUL FULLAM, Hingham District Court and others
Lane-Bey v. Alfred Lane T98017, et al
as 23-1993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED DARNELL LANE-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ALFRED DARNELL LANE T98017, MAURA TRACY HEALEY, Governor, State of Massachusetts, in her individual and official capacity, SHAWN P. JENKINS, Chief of Staff, Massachusetts Department of Correction, in his individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
