Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Belanger, et al v. BNY Mellon, N.A., et al
as 17-1376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA SIEGEL BELANGER and DEVORA C. KAISER
Defendant / Appellee:
BNY MELLON, N.A., BRIAN NAGLE, ESQ., TARLOW, BREED, HART & RODGERS, PC and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM AUSTIN, CPA, THOMAS J. BARBAR, BERID & SCHUTZBANK, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-2122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Belanger, et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusett
as 15-2515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA SIEGEL BELANGER and DEVORA C. KAISER
Defendant:
BNY MELLON ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, BRIAN NAGLE, BURNS & LEVINSON, LLP and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Hart v. Thompson
as 14-1430
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. HART
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. THOMPSON, Superintendent, MCI Concord
Wong v. MA Dept of Social Services, et al
as 13-1423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHU SHEAN WONG
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, a/k/a Department of Children and Families, JOY HART, BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
CHARLES MOORE
Interested Party:
MARC A. WHALEY, BOURNEWOOD HOSPITAL, IRINA MEZEHBOUSKY, MD and others
Shu Wong v. MA Dept of Social Services, et al
as 12-1892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHU SHEAN WONG
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, a/k/a Department of Children and Families, JOY HART, BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
PAULA AENNGER, THEA A. STEWART, ST. MARY'S CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN and others
Hart v. McCafferty, et al
as 12-8002
Petitioner:
KENNETH H. HART
Respondent:
LANDYA B. MCCAFFERTY, U.S. Magistrate Judge, RICHARD A. HAMPE, Judge, Merrimack County, WILLIAM J. GRIFF, Judge, Hillsborough County and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.