Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Marshall v. Potter, et al
as 09-2593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS S. MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. POTTER, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES
Hoffman, et al v. United States Postal Service
as 09-2140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT HOFFMAN and BOSTON METRO AREA LOCAL 100, AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America, et al v. Physiotherapy Associates, Inc., et al
as 09-1575
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KERRY DEERING
Defendant - Appellee:
PHYSIOTHERAPY ASSOCIATES, INC. and STRYKER CORP.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2452
Plaintiff - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2346
Plaintiff - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Del-Toro-Pineiro v. United States Postal Service
as 08-1951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRUZ TERESA DEL-TORO-PINEIRO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Velazquez-Linares v. United States Government, et al
as 08-1548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIA VELAZQUEZ-LINARES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, Government, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General and others
Del Gallo v. Parent, et al
as 08-1511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RINALDO DEL GALLO, III
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER PARENT, United States Postal Service postmaster and PITTSFIELD POST OFFICE
Defendant:
ANTHONY RIELLO, Chief, Pittsfield Police Department
:
Fothergill v. US, et al
as 08-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUCY FOTHERGILL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.