Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Heien, et al v. Archstone, et al
as 15-2299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREA MANGONE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ENDICOTT PEABODY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BENJAMIN SPILLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ARCHSTONE NORTH POINT, LLC, ASN KENDALL SQUARE, LLC, ASN NORTH POINT I, LLC and others
Drewry v. Correct Care Solutions, et al
as 15-2184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON BOONE DREWRY
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, ELISABETH LAMSON, Health Services Administrator, ROBERT CLINTON, Regional Medical Director and others
Interested Party:
JANET T. MILLS, Attorney General
Dabrieo v. Wall, et al
as 15-1907
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE DABRIEO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSHUA WALL, CESAR ARCHILLA, CHARLENE BONNER and others
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
Drewry v. Correct Care Solutions, et al
as 15-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON BOONE DREWRY
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, ELISABETH LAMSON, Health Services Administrator, ROBERT CLINTON, Regional Medical Director and others
Interested Party:
JANET T. MILLS, Attorney General
Richard, et al v. State Street Bank and Trust Co, et al
as 15-1597
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CASEY J. RICHARD, MARILYN DEMORY, TIMOTHY W. HILL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
CHARLES F. FRANZ and NITA W. FRANZ
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, NORTH AMERICAN BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF STATE STREET CORPORATION, STATE STREET CORPORATION, INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Defendant:
RICHARD LOGUE and LEHMAN BROTHERS INC.
Interested Party:
MIAMI BEACH EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN, THOMAS U. KENNEY and NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER INDUSTRY WELFARE FUND
Villanueva v. Lanoie, et al
as 15-1417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CESAR VILLANUEVA
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and ERNIE LIACOPOLUS, Dentist
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. LANOIE, Superintendent, MARYLIN MORNINGSTAR, Medical Director, R.N., KEVIN BROWN, Assistant Superintendent of the Franklin County House of Correction and others
Hill-Spotswood v. Mayhew, et al
as 15-1229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMIE HILL-SPOTSWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY C. MAYHEW, STATE OF ME DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ROLAND PUSHARD and others
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1212
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff:
KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, ex rel. James D. "Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General
Defendant - Appellee:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant:
WALTER L. WEISMAN
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1212
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff:
KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, ex rel. James D. "Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellee:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant:
WALTER L. WEISMAN
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1211
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff:
KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIM HOOD, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, ex rel. The State of Mississippi
Defendant - Appellee:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant:
WALTER L. WEISMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
