Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 17-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant: MICHELLE GONYEA, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Ray Brook, f/k/a FNU Gaunyea, FNU KUZNECOW, (first name unknown) Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, K. LEWIS, Physician's Assistant, FCI Berlin and others
Defendant - Appellee: E. L. TATUM, Warden, FCI Berlin, a/k/a Esker Lee Tatum, DAN SULLIVAN, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Berlin, WANDA MULLINS, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin and others
Interested Party: BRIAN PATTERSON
Clemens v. Doe, et al
as 17-1124
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY L. CLEMENS
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and JANE DOE
Brown, et al v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plast, et al
as 16-8055
Plaintiff - Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER BLUNDON, KEVIN BROWN and ADAM W. DYER
Appellee: GWENAEL BUSNEL
Defendant - Respondent: SAINT-GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORPORATION
Defendant: DOES 1-5
Marrero-Rolon, et al v. Shell Trading (US) Co., et al
as 16-8049
Respondent: ISMAEL MARRERO-ROLON, ANNE CATESBY JONES, JORGE VALDES LLAUGER and others
Defendant: ASOCIACION DE JUBILADOS DE LA AUTORIDAD DE ENERGIA ELECTRICA, a/k/a Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA), WILLIAM RODNEY CLARK, EDWIN RODRIGUEZ and others
Petitioner: SHELL TRADING (US) COMPANY
Albert v. Murtiff, et al
as 16-2205
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL J. ALBERT, SR.
Defendant - Appellee: BENJAMIN J. MURTIFF, individually and in his official capacity as Officer for the City of Augusta and VINCENTE MORRIS, individually and in his official capacity as Officer for the City of Augusta
Defendant: CITY OF AUGUSTA, JOHN DOE 1, individually and in the official capacity as Officer for the City of Augusta, JOHN DOE 2, individually and in the official capacity as Officer for the City of Augusta and others
Jones-Theophilious v. United States, et al
as 15-8045
Petitioner: BRETT JONES-THEOPHILIOUS
Respondent: UNITED STATES and DOES, 1-184,000 Names Known + Unknown
Jane Doe (1), et al v. Backpage.com, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1724
Plaintiff - Appellant: JANE DOE (1), JANE DOE (2), JANE DOE (3) and others
Defendant - Appellee: BACKPAGE.COM, LLC, CAMARILLO HOLDINGS, LLC, f/k/a Village Voice Media Holding, LLC and NEW TIMES MEDIA, LLC
Interested Party: MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION and others
Artis, et al v. N.E. Compounding Pharmacy, Inc, et al
as 14-1714
Plaintiff - Appellant: SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee: NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC, d/b/a New England Compounding Center, AMERIDOSE, LLC, MEDICAL SALES MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Trustee: PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center
Interested Party: PAIN MEDICINE SPECIALISTS PA, UNIVERSAL PAIN MANAGEMENT MEDICAL CORPORATION, d/b/a/ Universal Pain Management, PAIN ASSOCIATES OF CHARLSETON, LLC, d/b/a InverveneMD and others
Defendant: HOWELL ALLEN CLINIC, DEBRA SCHAMBERG, INSIGHT IMAGING, INC. and others
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN GUZMAN
Interested Party - Intervenor: OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, in the Chapter 11 Case of New England Compunding Pharmacy, Inc
Cascade Yarns, Inc. v. Knitting Fever, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2302
Plaintiff - Appellant: CASCADE YARNS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: KNITTING FEVER, INC., a New York corporation, DESIGNER YARNS, LTD, a Corporation of England, EMMEPIEFFE, SRL, an entity organized or existing under the laws of Italy and others
Interested Party: CASHMERE AND CAMEL HAIR MANUFACTURERS' INSTITUTE
Type: Other Statutes RICO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?